Essay on the analysis of the problem of the end of art in G.W.F. Hegel and Arthur C. Danto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.vi10.368Keywords:
Aesthetics, art, PhilosophyAbstract
This work studies the problem of the end of art in G.W. F. Hegel and Arthur C, Danto. Its hypothesis is that, based on the analysis of the aesthetic philosophy of both authors, in the present time, art entered in a scenario where there is no definitive criterion to say what a work of art is or is not. In this sense, everything can be considered a work of art.
Downloads
References
Danto, A. C. (1999). Después del fin del arte. Barcelona: Paidós. Traducción Elena Neerman Rodríguez.
Rosset, C. (1993). Lo real y su doble. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Kuspit, D. (2006). El fin del arte. Madrid: Akal. Traducción Alfredo Brotones Muños.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2011). Lecciones sobre la estética. Madrid: Akal. Traducción Alfredo Brotones Muños.
Adorno, T. W. (2004). Teoría estética. Madrid: Akal. Editado por Gretel Adorno y Rolf Tiedemann.
Nietzsche, F. (2018). El nacimiento de la tragedia . México: Editores Mexicanos Unidos .
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
ÍNDEX, Journal of Contemporary Art, manages its content rights under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 license. In this regard, submissions remain subject to the author’s decision.
