The concepts of symptom and loss of Georges Didi-Huberman in two works of Yishai Jusidman

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))
Published: Jun 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.v0i07.161
Keywords:
Symptom lost Didi-Huberman Yishai Jusidman images holocaust Contemporary art

Main Article Content

Adriana Guadalupe Alonso
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Abstract

This article establishes a dialogue between two paintings of the artist Yishai Jusidman using the concepts of symptom and loss proposed by the art historian Georges Didi-Huberman. The pieces in question are titled Majdanek and Auschwitz, which were part of the Azul de Prusia exhibition, held at the Museo Universitario de Arte Contemporáneo UNAM (2016-2017). The thinking is stablished through the analysis of both pictorial representations, regarding the nonvisible as a condition of critical possibility that enable us to situate in the gap between the sensible and the intelligible. Furthermore, the article seeks to observe the status of the gaze from the memory, as the ability of articulating heterogeneous times, as well as analyze the concepts of veil-image and tear-image to differentiate between those that have been considered according to the demands of history and those that encourage us to think and produce other images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alonso, A. G. (2019). The concepts of symptom and loss of Georges Didi-Huberman in two works of Yishai Jusidman. Index, Contemporary Art Magazine, (07), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.v0i07.161
Issue
Vol. 0 No. 07 (2019): Contemporary Artistic Practices
Section
Art Themes

Index, revista de arte contemporáneo maneja sus derechos bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0. En ese sentido los envíos quedan sujetos a la decisión del autor.

References

Benjamin, W. (1969), Charles Baudelaire, ein Lyriker im Zeitolter des Hochkapitalismus. Francfort: Suhrkamp

Benjamin W. (1991). Gesammelte Schriften. Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.

Benjamin, W. (2003). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. México: Ítaca

Benjamin, W. (2005). Libro de los pasajes. AKAL.

Benjamin, W. (2018). Iluminaciones. Taurus.

Didi- Huberman, G. (2004). Imágenes pese a todo. Barcelona: Paidós.

Didi- Huberman, G. (2006). Ante el tiempo. Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo.

Didi- Huberman, G. (2010). Lo que vemos, lo que nos mira. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Mizrahi, E. (2018). Ver y saber en torno a la imagen. En Sublevaciones (pp.168-169). México: MUAC-UNAM.

Roy, V. (2016). Fuga y Catástrofe. En Azul de Prusia (p. 10). México: MUAC-UNAM.

Salas Guerra, C. (julio-diciembre 2016). Latencias de la imagen: Anacronismo y síntoma. En Revista Colombiana de pensamiento estético e Historia del Arte. Volumen 4, (pp. 42-77).